HIi Dev,
Hi
Yes it is possible. You need to have vendor subrange. Every subrange for a vendor can have different purchase details. You can have vendor subrange at vendormaster purchase organization additional data. For more information see the below link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/e2/f3333956bd9f05e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Thanks,
Gurtej
Hi,
If vendor has branches in 2 countries, you will have to create 2 vendor master as the vendor address details are at client level. Split valuation never comes in to picture in this scenario and in the example you have given above.
You may maintain different vendor currency for different purchase org or plant. Also, can be changed manually in Purchase order as explained by AKPT.
Regards,
Sudeep.
Hi Kelly,
Can you please advise where can we see the settings to not to maintain the quantity for rebate credit memo ?
Even I have a query why the quantity is not copied for the Rebate credit request /memo of B3 type when compared with the normal credit request / memo of G2 type.
Appreciate your response.
Thanks
Sankar
Hi Sameer,
Thanks for your reply.. I am not using sampling schemes...sampling procedures are fixed samples as explained to Mr. Manish...
My problem is not with no of physical samples ....issue with sample size of physical samples like 80 g of primary samples and 100 gms of pooled samples...how this sample size is calculated....
Thanks
Kumar
Hello
it is impossible to Edit manually AFVGD-FSAVD field in ALV Operations tab of the maintenance order and this STD SAP behavior.You can make changed in this fields with help of scheduling function of the order only.
It also recommended not to make this possible via any table update.
Br
Rakesh
Hi Imran,
Check the paramater rdisp/max_wprun_time. Go to RZ11 and enter the parameter. Then go to change value. By default it must have been set as 600 seconds. change that to 3600 seconds or so in new value and save it.
Try this if it works and lets also wait for other experts to comment on this.
Regards,
Amit Rajoria
Hi Jurgen,
Sorry about that. Anyway, I'll take note of that and moving forward, I will include the message number of the error.
Thanks,
Matt
Hope you are aware that all web templates are developed in WAD. You have to check there..
please be kind to mark the correct/helpful ans. and closing the thread.
Hi Experts - The following is the business requirement which needs to be fulfilled:
Delivery block is needed at schedule line level that will block the creation of production order.
Events to construct the scenario:
Material: Produced Internally
Help is requested. If this is possible via enhancement please provide the details of the same.
Regards
Siddharth
Hi Jorge,
Thanks for the reply, I have checked as per your suggestions but unable to find the Net weaver version. For example in our SRM system, I have checked with tx.se16--> prdvers. please find the screenshot.
But I am unable to find the same in CRM 7.0 EHp2 system.
Please suggest me.
Thanks in advance.
Bhaskar N
Hi Pankaj
Never tried this, so I will be honest that I am experimenting on you 
The settings lies in OAVH for period controls.. Here you can see how it is designed
You can try with 24 instead of 12 after 31 i.e. Year = Blank, M = 12, Day = 31 and Period = 24
Try this and see if it works..
When you assign Period = 24, it means that Dep should start after 24 months
Br. Ajay M
Hi,
ZWMM_121_INV_HISTORY [DS structure for Inventory History]
| Component | Component Type | Data Type | Length | Decimals | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATNR | MATNR | CHAR | 18 | 0 | Material Number |
| WERKS | WERKS_D | CHAR | 4 | 0 | Plant |
| PERID_DT | DAT00 | DATS | 8 | 0 | Receipt/Requirements date |
| MTART | MTART | CHAR | 4 | 0 | Material Type |
| CURR_DATE | IHC_DTE_PN_PROC_DATE | DATS | 8 | 0 | Date Executed |
| INVENTORY | FIP_STOCK | QUAN | 13 | 3 | Stock |
| SUPPLY_PROJ | ZW_MM_121_EXP_QTY | QUAN | 13 | 3 | Expected Qty |
| BMEIN | BMEIN | UNIT | 3 | 0 | Unit of measure for base quantity |
From BODS
From SAP
Thanks Ajay for your quick reply. But request to answer about 3rd question i asked:
How to bring both above (direct capatilised asset+ AUC) under common Planning and Budgeting platform so that client can monitor the buget
as whole for above two methods at a time and steps for the same?
As per your proposed solution there will be two internal order 1st as Stastical IO for direct capatilisation and 2nd as real IO for AUC settlement.How to track total capatilisation in this case?
I have view: 1.Create one Real Internal Order which have planning and budgeting activated 2. Book all expenses for any type of asset to This IO 3. At time of periodic settlement, transfer desired expenses to AUC or to final asset via settlement rule...this way we can mange both under one budget monitor of IO....
Questions:
1. Let me know your view whether approach i mentioned is feasible? I assume that if IO has Rs 100, than Rs 40 can be settle to AUC from IO and Rs 60 can be directly trf to Final Asset from IO without AUC inbetween. And above two settle can be done at a time during period close.
2. In what case we need to follow stastical IO approach when we can always route through real IO and can capatilise either to AUC or to final asset even without IM or PS active?
Request revert....
Hello Midhun,
We have removed the sync parameter and checked in preview for MBO too. It is fetching records as well.Am getting the same exception when calling subscribe method before calling synchronization.Please do the needful.
Plz check the below screen shot.
Hello,
As already stated, for ECC side u can use proxy and send data to PI - I don't think there could be any other better option than this.
Now, for DB u can choose both the option like u can create 11 (update_insert or insert) statements in PI for those 11 tables and do ur mapping (i hope all those 11 tables belong to same DB?).
U can check below blog for this approach ( i would suggest you to go through all the series part 1 to 6)
Or the other way is to create SP in DB and let SP take care of performing DML operations in DB. This way u will have better flexibility in doing error handling and performance wise also it's a good solution (if i were u then i would have opted this).
Thanks
Amit Srivastava
HI Vinod,
The best way is the way mentioned by Amit. Also, if you have a DB developer team you can choose another option, they can do a stored procedure to receive all the data and to do internally the table actualization. Another option is the DB team will develop a SOAP interface in the DB, it's not too difficult and you will can connect with Proxy-SOAP interface, the SOAP interface is wider and in my opinion more generic if in the future th DB is going to upgrade or to change.
Regards.
Hi Experts,
I have an issue where the Sold-To-Party is not getting created in Outbound Delivery(VL02N) when created from PO. The Outbound Delivery is getting created from Tcode: VL10B using Purchase Order.
When the Outbound Delivery is getting created, only Ship-to-Party is getting created not the Sold-to-Party. This issue is coming after the Version Upgrade from 4.6 to ECC6.
I tried to debug the program VL10B but could not find anything for much help.
Kindly suggest.
Regards
Gopa
Hi All,
I have upgrade sap router license, now the problem is when SAP is trying to connect server through R/3 connection they are not able to connect its giving SNC error. OSS connection is working fine in servers.
When i have checked the command niping -c -O -S 3299 -H 192.168.1.6 it is giving error.
***LOG Q0I=> NiIWrite: P=192.168.1.6:3299; L=192.168.1.6:49753: WSASend (10054:
WSAECONNRESET: Connection reset by peer) [nixxi.cpp 4604]
*** ERROR => NiIWrite: SiSendV failed for hdl 1/sock 288
(SI_ECONN_BROKEN/10054; I4; ST; P=192.168.1.6:3299; L=192.168.1.6:49753) [ni
xxi.cpp 4604]
*** ERROR => NiTClientLoop: NiWrite (rc=-6) [nixxtst.cpp 2590]
*****************************************************************************
*
* ERROR connection to partner '192.168.1.6:3299' broken
*
* TIME Fri Feb 07 12:41:07 2014
* RELEASE 720
* COMPONENT NI (network interface)
* VERSION 40
* RC -6
* MODULE nixxi.cpp
* LINE 4604
* DETAIL NiIWrite: P=192.168.1.6:3299; L=192.168.1.6:49753
* SYSTEM CALL WSASend
* ERRNO 10054
* ERRNO TEXT WSAECONNRESET: Connection reset by peer
* COUNTER 1
*
*****************************************************************************
please help me to identifying where the problem.
Regards,
Pradeep,
Hello Experts,
I have requirement to make liability GL entry only after receiving customer payment e.g. if $ 30 XYZ charge is posted on the account , and if customer makes $ 20 payment then .. I would like to credit $ 20 to liability GL account and not $ 30 (so not the charge which was posted). To achieve this - I used statistical key approach. First defined main sub with statistical key 'G' and mapped these statistical sub to real subs using posting area 1010. I also defined liability GL account for these real subs in EK02.
My problem is - whenever I make a payment against these statistical charges, it actually not crediting against liability GL which is defined for real subs (EK02). Instead it is crediting completely different account. Am I missing some config here?
Could you please help me to resolve this issue as I am completely stuck here. Please also let me know if you think there is better way to address this requirement.
Regards,
A-jay.